MISCONCEPTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING TOPICS WILL BE EXPOSED-
1)REGARDING EKLAVYA.
2)REGARDING ARJUN'S BRAHMACHARYA(CELIBACY) VRATA
3)REGARDING ULUPI & CHITRANGADA.
4)ARJUN-YUDHISHTHIR MEETING,DAY 17,KURUKSHETRA
5)MISCONCEPTION REGARDING KARNA HAVING GEETA GYAN.
6)ARJUN'S MORAL CHARACTER.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1)REGARDING EKLAVYA
-Firstly,let me tell you,during Eklavya incident,Arjun was just a kid,its the most important point.And Eklavya was much older than Arjun,that's why he was better than Arjun that time.
-Dronacharya had promised Arjun that he would make him the best.
-Upon witnessing the feats of Eklavya,Arjun just reminded a great person(Drona) of the commitment he made,arjun never asked Drona for Eklavya's thumb.It was purely Drona's call.Blaming Arjun for it is just unfair.
Narrative:
'Thou hadst lovingly told me, clasping me, to thy bosom, that no pupil of thine should be equal to me. Why then is there a pupil of thine, the mighty son of the Nishada king, superior to me?"
(In the above narrative,Arjun is just reminding drona of his promise,nothing else)
-Now coming to the Jealosy point,when Eklavya lost his thumb,the fever of jealousy residing in Arjun's heart was gone.And don't forget Arjun was just a kid at that time.
IN BHAGWAT GEETA,KRISHNA CALLED ARJUN 'anasûya' WHICH MEANS-"Free From Envy & Jealousy"
BHAGWAT GEETA,CHAPTER 9,VERSE 1-
s'rî-bhagavân uvâca
idam tu te guhyatamam
pravakshyâmy #anasûyave
jñânam vijñâna-sahitam
yaj jñâtvâ mokshyase 's'ubhât
Krishna speaks of Arjuna as anasûya, "envy-less." What a great compliment! Therefore, He proposed to teach him the mysteries of spiritual discipline.
Anasûya or the absence of envy (not spiteful), jealousy and malice, is a prerequisite for gaining an intimate, immediate and personal experience of the omnipresent reality of divinity. Every spiritual aspirant must necessarily cultivate the quality of anasûya. It is a divine characteristic, which makes a man's personality pure and pellucid.
Asûya or chronic jealousy (indignation, especially at the merits or the happiness of another) is the source of all mental and physical ailments in this world. In order to acquire mental equipoise and inner tranquility, man should make his heart pure by purging his mind of this psychological mania called jealousy. Man must first humanize himself before attempting to divinize himself. To feel jealous of others even in trivial matters suppresses the humanitarian instincts of a person. Men, today, waste all their time and energy in blaming others without realizing that to search for and find faults in others is the most grievous and ghastly sin. Arjuna was completely free from the deadly qualities of envy, jealousy and malice. That is why he acquired the appellation of anasûya and deserved the nectarine message of the Bhagavad Gîtâ from Krishna.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2)REGARDING THE RULE OF CELIBACY DURING EXILE-
Now,The Karna fans claim that Arjun broke the Brahmacharya vrata.Firstly,Its nowhere written that Arjun Broke Brahmacharya Vrata.
In case of Ulupi,it was #Niyoga,so no Brahmacharya vrata was broken.
As per Dakshinatya(Southern Recension of Mahabharat),Arjun's exile was only for 12 months.Madhavacharya commentry also concurs with Dakshinatya here.But don't worry Karna fans,I will be proving from KMG Translation itself that Arjun followed Celibacy-
PLEASE READ THE BELOW NARRATIVE,VAISHAMPAYANA SAID THAT THE ONE WHO HAS FOLLOWED THE VOW OF CELIBACY CAN ONLY WITHDRAW BRAHMASIRASTRA.ELSE THAT WEAPON WILL DESTROY THE HEAD OF ATTACKER.AND WE ALL KNOW THAT ARJUN WAS SUCCESSFULL IN WITHDRAWING BRAHMASIRA.
SAUPTIKA PARVA,SECTION 15
Narrative:
Having said these words Dhananjaya withdrew his weapon. The withdrawal of that weapon by the gods themselves in battle is exceedingly difficult. Not excepting the great Indra himself, there was nobody save the son of Pandu, who was capable of withdrawing that high weapon after it had once been let off. That weapon was born of Brahma energy. No person of uncleansed soul can bring it back after it is once let off. Only one that leads the life of a #brahmacari can do it. If one who has not practised the vow of #brahmacarya seeks to bring it back after having shot it, it strikes off his own head and destroys him with all his equipments. Arjuna was a #brahmacari and an observer of vows. Having obtained that almost unobtainable weapon, he had never used it even when plunged into situations of the greatest danger. Observant of the vow of truth, possessed of great heroism, leading the life of a brahmacari, the son of Pandu was submissive and obedient to all his superiors. It was for this that he succeeded in withdrawing his weapon.
THERE ARE A LOT MORE STORIES TO TELL ABOUT CELIBACY WHICH ALSO PROVE THAT ARJUN'S CELIBACY WAS NOT BROKEN,BUT I THINK THIS NARRATIVE IS ENOUGH TO PROVE.
SO THE ABOVE NARRATIVE FROM KMG MAKES IT CLEAR THAT ARJUN'S CELIBACY WAS NEVER BROKEN.IT WAS BROKEN ONLY AS PER SOME FOOLISH KARNA FANS,WHO HAVE'NT READ MAHABHARAT PROPERLY.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)REGARDING ULUPI & CHITRANGADA.
Now,some hypocrite fans of Karna say that Arjun used Ulupi and Chitrangada for his physical satisfaction and later left them alone...LOLZ Let me clear these propogandas.
Please note:In both these cases,brahmacharya of arjun was not broken,as proved in previous point.
--------------
ULUPI-
-Arjun did not seek ulupi...ulupi seek arjun.It was on ulupi's request that Arjun made physical relation with her.Please read the narrative below-
Ulupi saying this to Arjun-
Narrative:
Thy virtue cannot sustain any diminution (by acceding to my solicitation). Then again, O thou of large eyes, it is a duty to relieve the distressed. Thy virtue suffereth no diminution by relieving me. Oh, if(by this act), O Arjuna, thy virtue doth suffer a small diminution, thou wilt acquire great merit by saving my life. Know me for thy worshipper, O Partha! Therefore, yield thyself up to me! Even this, O lord, is the opinion of the wise (viz., that one should accept a woman that wooeth). If thou do not act in this way, know that I will destroy myself. O thou of mighty arms, earn great merit by saving my life. I seek thy shelter, O best of men! Thou protectest always, O son of Kunti, the afflicted and the masterless. I seek thy protection, weeping in sorrow. I woo thee, being filled with desire. Therefore, do what is agreeable to me. It behoveth thee to gratify my wish by yielding thy self up to me.'
-Ulupi reminded Arjun of a duty,she said to Arjun that he would acquire great merit by saving her life(As written in the narrative),it was a Niyoga.
-Kunti had also performed Niyoga with Indra and other gods,do those gods lived with Kunti after that? NO
-While Arjun was leaving,Ulupi also granted him a boon,that he would be invincible in water.
-------------------------
CHITRANGADA-
ANOTHER HEIGHTS OF IDIOTISM BY SOME EVIL FOLLOWERS OF KARNA.
Arjun desired Chitrangada,there is no problem in man desiring a woman.He married her and lived for 3 years with her.Now the idiocity of Karna fans is that they say Arjun left her alone.
Please read the narrative below,said by Chitrangada's father to Arjun--
Narrative:
All my ancestors (one after another) had each a male child. I, however, have only a daughter to perpetuate my race. But, O bull amongst men, I ever look upon this daughter of mine as my son. O bull of Bharata's race, I have duly made her a #Putrika. Therefore, one amongst the sons that may be begotten upon her by thee, O Bharata, shall be the perpetuator of my race.
KEYWORD-'Putrika'
MEANING-A daughter appointed to raise male issue to be adopted by a father who has no sons
-CHITRANGADA HAD NO BROTHERS,SO THEIR WAS NO HEIR OF MANIPURA.
-ARJUN COULD MARRY CHITRANGADA ONLY ON HER FATHERS CONDITION THAT THEIR SON WOULD NOT BE A HEIR OF ARJUN,HE SHALL BE A HEIR OF MANIPUR.
-AFTER BABHRUVAHAN WAS BORN,ARJUN TOOK LEAVE BECAUSE HE HAD TO RETURN TO INDRAPRASTA FINALLY,BUT CHITRANGADA COULD NOT ACCOMPANY ARJUN AS SHE WAS THE 'PUTRIKA' AND SHE HAD TO TAKE CARE OF BABHRUVAHAN ALSO.
BRAHMACHARYA VRATA OF ARJUN WAS NOT BROKEN AS PROVED EARLIER.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)ARJUN-YUDHISHTHIR MEETING,DAY 17,KURUKSHETRA
NOW,SOME ILLITERATE FANS OF KARNA ARE SAYING THAT LORD KRISHNA CALLED ARJUN A 'FOOL' AND 'SINNER',LOL
NARRATIVE WHICH THEY GAVE-
Partha, even as thou hast been stupefied, in discriminating between what should be done and what should not. This vow, O Partha, was adopted by thee before from#foolishness. In consequence of that vow thou art now, from folly, desirous of perpetrating a #sinful act.
THESE COMEDIANS ALWAYS ENTERTAIN US FOR FREE
-Now let me tell you the entire thing,Arjun had a 'Secret Vow',every Kshatriya had it.It was that if any person asked him to abandon his 'Gandiv Bow' he would kill him.
-Now when Yudhishthir was badly wounded on 17th Day,Arjun went to his camp,Yudhishthir thought that Arjun had killed Karna,but he had not,so he got disappointed and asked Arjun to abandon his Gandiv.
-Arjun had to follow his vow unwillingly,it was for this vow,that Krishna called this a sinful act.Again it was a matter of following dharma(Oh I forgot,these Karna fans are followers of Adhmarma,how can they understand Dharma)
Please read the entire conversation here,if you wish
THOSE IGNORANTS ALSO SAY THAT LORD KRISHNA CALLED ARJUN 'ENUNCH',HE SAID SO BECAUSE ARJUN WAS BOUNDED BY THE LOVE AND AFFECTION TOWARDS HIS GRANDSIRE,HIS PRECEPTOR,EVEN HIS COUSINS WHO ALWAYS DID BAD WITH HIM.LORD KRISHNA SAID THIS TO PROVOKE ARJUN,HE WAS A WARRIOR WITH A SOFT HEART.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
5)KARNA HAVING GEETA GYAN
LOLZ,RIGHT GUYS,EVEN I WAS LAUGHING AT THE LOGIC BY WHICH KARNA FANS WERE TRYING TO PROVE THAT KARNA ALSO POSSESS GEETA GYAN.
THE PROPAGANDA BROUGHT UP BY KARNA FANS IS-
Suryadev got geeta gyan thousands of years ago,and Karna being a reincarnation of Surya also posessed this Knowledge
DON'T WORRY GUYS,WE WOULD NULLIFY THIS PROPAGANDA ALSO
Explanation:
SURYA HAS 12 DIFFERENT FORMS,AMOUNG THEM VIVASWAT SURYA IS THE FOREMOST OF ALL.IT WAS VIVASWAT SURYA WHO GOT GEETA GYAN.
BUT KARNA WAS NOT THE SON OF VIVASWAT SURYA....KARNA WAS THE SON OF ARKA SURYA,WHO DID NOT POSSESS GEETA GYAN,HENCE NO LOGIC OF KARNA HAVING GEETA GYAN
VIVASWAT SURYA HAVING GEETA GYAN-
Narrative:
"The Holy One said,--'This imperishable (system of devotion I declared to #Vivaswat: Vivaswat(surya)declared it to Manu; and Manu communicated it to Ikshaku.Descending thus from generation, the Royal sages came to know it.
KARNA BEING SON OF ARKA SURYA-
Narrative:
And, O bull of Bharata's race, #Arka addressed her again and said, 'O princess, for my sake, it shall not be sinful for thee to grant my wish.'Thus speaking unto the daughter of Kuntibhoja, the illustrious Tapana-- the illuminator of the universe-- gratified his wish. And of this
connection there was immediately born a son known all over the world as Karna accountred with natural armour and with face brightened by ear-rings
See this line-
And, O bull of Bharata's race, #Arka addressed her again and said
SO KARNA WAS THE SON OF ARKA,WHO DIDN'T HAD GEETA KNOWLEDGE.
SOME PEOPLE CALL KARNA AS YUDHISHTHIR'S UNCLE,BCZ YUDHISHTHIR WAS SON OF YAMA AND YAMA WAS SON SURYA.
PLEASE STOP CALLING HIM YUDHISHTHIR'S UNCLE,BECAUSE YAMA WAS THE SON OF VIVASWAT SURYA,NOT ARKA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
6)LITTLE ABOUT ARJUN'S MORAL CHARACTER
SOME OBSESSED FANS OF KARNA CALL ARJUN 'MAHANALAYAK' I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHETHER I SHOULD LAUGH AT THIS COMEDY OF CRY ON THEIR FOOLISHNESS.
ARJUN WAS MAHANALAYAK,THAT'S WHY HE GOT GEETA GYAN.
ARJUN WAS MAHANALAYAK,THAT'S WHY HE WAS DEARER TO LORD KRISHNA EVEN MORE THAN HIS WIVES AND CHILDREN(SAID BY KRISHNA HIMSELF IN JAYADRATH WADH PARVA)
ARJUN WAS NARA INCARNATION OF LORD VISHNU,AND SOME IDIOTS CALL HIM MAHANALAYAK.
ARJUN WAS A MAHANALAYAK,THAT'S WHY AFTER DEATH,HE ATTAINED THE SUPREME ABODE OF LORD KRISHNA,'PARAM DHAMA'(VAIKUNTH)
IN BHAGWAT GEETA,LORD KRISHNA HAS CALLED ARJUN A SINLESS PERSON.
ARJUN REJECTED URVASHI'S PROPOSAL,THE MOST BEAUTIFUL APSARA,AND SOME IDIOTS SAY THAT ARJUN DID NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER HIMSELF LOL
AMPLE SUCH THINGS ABOUT ARJUN COULD BE FOUND IN MAHABHARAT,GEETA AND PURANAS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(To Be Continued...)
No comments:
Post a Comment